Yazar "Oztürk K." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Foley balloon placement for maxillofacial fractures [Maksillofasiyal kiriklarda foley kateter balonunun kullanimi.]
    (2006) Keleş B.; Oztürk K.; Arbag H.; Yaman H.; Cenik Z.
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of maxillary sinus Foley balloon placement in patients with maxillofacial fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 38 patients (10 females, 28 males; mean age 29.1+/-11.6; range 9 to 49 years) in whom Foley balloon placement and gauze packing were performed for blow-out, orbitozygomatic, or maxillary fractures. Sex and age distributions, etiology of trauma, localization of fractures, management, intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had blow-out fractures, 15 patients had orbitozygomatic fractures, and five patients had Le Fort II-III fractures of the maxilla. Preoperatively, enophthalmos, diplopia, limited ocular motility, and facial asymmetry were found in 28.9%, 26.3%,18.4% and 65.8%, respectively. Sufficient maxillary sinus patency was obtained in 32 patients (84.2%). Enophthalmos, diplopia, limited ocular motility, and facial asymmetry were found in 13.2%, 7.9%, 5.3%, and 18.4% in the postoperative period, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maxillary Foley balloon placement should be preferred in the blow-out, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary fractures because it supports the orbital floor and provides sufficient maxillary sinus patency.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    [Frontal sinus obliteration with pericranial-subgaleal flap]. [Perikraniyal-subgaleal flep ile frontal sinüs obliterasyonu.]
    (2010) Oztürk K.; Duran M.; Arba? H.; Keleş B.; Kara M.; Uyar Y.
    We evaluated the results of patients who underwent frontal sinus obliteration with vascularized pericranial-subgaleal flap. Charts of patients (7 males 1 female; mean age 40.5+/-17.1 years; range 9 to 61 years) who underwent frontal sinus obliteration with pericranial-subgaleal flap between June 2001 and January 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, indications for frontal sinus obliteration, immediate and late postoperative complications were recorded. All patients were invited to the clinic and underwent control examinations and computed tomography. The indications for frontal sinus obliteration were fracture of frontal sinus anterior and posterior walls in four cases, frontal sinus mucoceles in two cases, mucopyoceles in one case and fracture of frontal sinus anterior wall in one case. Bicoronal incision was used in all patients and then they underwent frontal sinus obliteration with lateraly based pericranial-subgaleal flap. In the postoperative period rhinorrhea and meningitis, which lasted for two days, developed in one patient with fracture of frontal sinus anterior-posterior walls and hypoestesia developed in the frontal skin area in one patient with fracture of frontal sinus anterior wall. No complications were observed in the other cases. Pericranial-subgaleal flap is a well vascularized, close to surgical area, inexpensive, safe and effective tissue that can be used for frontal sinus obliteration.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Petrous bone lesions [Petröz kemik lezyonlari]
    (2006) Oztürk K.; Uyar Y.; Ulkü C.H.; Arba? H.; Keleş B.; Yaman H.
    OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the results of treatment and follow-up of patients with petrous bone lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 13 patients (5 females, 8 males; mean age 33.8+/-17.4 years; range 4.5 to 65 years) who were treated and followed-up for petrous bone lesions between 1990 and 2004. The diagnoses were cholesterol granuloma (n=2; 15.4%), chondrosarcoma (n=1; 7.7%), and cholesteatoma (n=10; 76.9%). RESULTS: Patients with cholesterol granuloma had complaints of cephalgia and diplopia while those with cholesteatoma complained of otorrhea and hearing loss. One patient with cholesterol granuloma and eight patients with cholesteatoma underwent surgical operations with the use of middle skull base approach (n=1), transcochlear approach (n=2), translabyrinthine approach (n=1), and tympanopetrosectomy (n=5). Two cases with congenital cholesteatoma and one patient with cholesterol granuloma refused surgical intervention and were only followed-up. CONCLUSION: Besides surgical intervention, follow-up by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging may be considered in patients with incidental petrous bone lesions, presenting with limited symptoms.