Maxillary sinus volumes of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErdur, Omer
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Faruk Izzet
dc.contributor.authorSekerci, Ahmet Ercan
dc.contributor.authorCelikoglu, Mevlut
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:06:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Studies about maxillary sinuses of cleft lip-palate patients have increased since sinusitis is commonly observed in these patients. It is evident that maxillary sinus will be morphologically affected in these patients. And anatomic differences may be a cause or at least a contributor of sinusitis. The aim of this study was to compare maxillary sinus volumes of the non-syndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip-palate and control group by using Cone-Beam computed tomography. Methods: Tomography scans of 44 unilateral cleft lip-palate patients (18 right and 26 left) with age and gender matched 45 control patients were evaluated for the study. The images used in the study were part of the diagnostic records collected due to dental treatment needs. All tomographs were obtained in supine position by using Cone-Beam computed tomography (NewTom 5G, QR, Verona, Italy). The patient-specific Hounsfield values were set to include the largest amount of voxels in the sinuses volume calculation individually. All data were measured in mm(3). Results: There was no statistically difference between the gender and age distributions of the groups. No statistically significant difference was found on the cleft and non-cleft side, the right and left side of the unilateral cleft lip-palate patients and the control group (P > 0.05). For the inter group comparison, mean maxillary sinus volumes volume of unilateral cleft lip-palate patients (9894.55 +/- 4171.44 mm(3)) was statistically smaller than the control group (11,977.90 +/- 4484.93 mm(3)) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Maxillary sinus volumes were effected negatively in unilateral cleft lip-palate patients when compared with the healthy control group. No difference was found on the cleft, non-cleft side and the right-left side of the unilateral cleft lip-palate patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.003en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1744en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876en_US
dc.identifier.issn1872-8464en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26292906en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1741en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32313
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000361777600027en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary sinusen_US
dc.subjectCleft lipen_US
dc.subjectCleft palateen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleMaxillary sinus volumes of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu