The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity

dc.contributor.authorDuran, I
dc.contributor.authorSengun, A
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:55:34Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the long-term effectiveness of five desensitizing products on 25 male and 27 female patients (total 52) aged 21-67 years (mean 36 +/- 7 years) suffering from cervical dentine sensitivity. All subjects were seen by the same examiner (ID) who was blinded to the applied treatment for 3-month clinical study. Patients were asked to record their overall sensitivity by marking a point on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Two hundred and seventy-seven sensitive teeth were treated by one of the five desensitizing products, all of which were placed following manufacturers' instructions by the other investigator (AS). A paired (split mouth) study design was used and selection of quadrants was randomized. At the post-treatment and at 10 days and 3 months periods, sensitivity measurements were recorded by the same investigator (ID). Statistical analysis showed that all of the VAS scores at post-treatment evaluation points were significantly decreased compared with baseline data (P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in mean sensitivity scores in the Protect Liner F and the Health-Dent Desensitizer groups when compared with Fluoline varnish at the 10-day time point (P < 0.05). At 3 months, the Protect Liner F group continued to show a significantly reduced sensitivity level when compared with Health-Dent Desensitizer, Single Bond, Fluoline and Gluma Desensitizer (P < 0.05). The present study demonstrated that although at the end of 3-month evaluation period all desensitizers showed lower VAS sensitivity values compared with baseline, there were differences in the level of reduction of cervical dentine sensitivity.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01241.xen_US
dc.identifier.endpage356en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-182Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15089941en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage351en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01241.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/19251
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000221244100011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectcervical dentine sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectVisual Analogue Scaleen_US
dc.subjecthydroxyethylmethacrylateen_US
dc.subjectdesensitizersen_US
dc.titleThe long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
duran2004 (1).pdf
Boyut:
165.26 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: