The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorHakki, Sema S.
dc.contributor.authorTatar, Gulsah
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Niyazi
dc.contributor.authorDemiralp, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:42:51Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:42:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this in vitro study are to compare the efficacy of different cleaning methods in removing debris of failed implants and to detect thermal changes of the implants treated by various scaling instruments. Twenty-seven failed implants and two unused implants as control were included to this study-group 1: plastic curette (P), group 2: titanium curette (T), group 3: carbon curette (C), group 4: titanium brush (TB), group 5: Er:YAG laser (laser 1 (L1) 100 mJ/pulse at 10 Hz), group 6: Er:YAG laser (laser 2 (L2) 150 mJ/pulse at 10 Hz), group 7: Er:YAG laser (laser 3 (L3) 200 mJ/pulse at 10 Hz), group 8: ultrasonic scaler appropriate for titanium (US), group 9: air abrasive method (AA) + citric acid, and group 10: implantoplasty (I). The changes on the treated/untreated titanium surfaces and remnant debris were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Temperature of the implants before and after treatment was detected using a thermocouple. The use of air abrasive and citric acid combination and Er:YAG laser groups was found as the best methods for the decontamination of titanium surfaces of failed implant. When the hand instruments were compared, titanium curette was found better than both the plastic and the carbon curettes which leave plastics and carbon remnants on the titanium surface. The temperature was higher after hand instrumentation when compared to other experimental groups (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the present in vitro model, it can be concluded that the best method for decontamination of the implant surface is the use of air abrasives and Er:YAG laser.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University Research Foundation (SSH), Konya, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Mutlu Dental Company, Turkey, for providing failed implants. SEM and EDX analysis of this study was supported by Selcuk University Research Foundation (SSH), Konya, Turkey. This study was presented as a poster in EAO congress in Rome (2014), Italy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-017-2149-2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage571en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921en_US
dc.identifier.issn1435-604Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28160204en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage563en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2149-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35538
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398716200010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectImplant surfaceen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectHand instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic scaleren_US
dc.subjectAir abrasiveen_US
dc.subjectTemperatureen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu