Study of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) Infection in Dairy Cattle

dc.contributor.authorOzer, Erol
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Rustem
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:16:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:16:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, blood and milk samples were collected from 500 cattle that were selected out of 1250 cattle by random sampling. method (40% of the animals) and detected by their ear numbers, located in 5 different enterprises in Konya and around between the years 2009-2010 and not vaccinated with Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD). Serum samples prepared from these specimen (blood and milk) were studied for antibody presence using commercial indirect ELISA kits and white blood cell samples were studied for antigen presence by commercially obtained direct ELISA kit. As a result of ELISA applied to blood serum samples, out of 500 animals, 449 were detected positive, 6 doubtful and 45 negative. Seropositivity was detected between 80.68-100% on the basis of enterprises while it was at a rate of 89.80% regionwide. As a result of ELISA applied to milk serum samples, out of 500 animals, 442 were detected positive, 1 doubtful and 57 negative. Seropositivity was detected between 82.50-95.24% on the basis of enterprises while it was at a rate of 88.40% regionwide. At the first step of the virological part of the study, as a result of ELISA applied to detect BVDV antigen in white blood cell samples, antigen presence was detected in only 3 animals out of 500 (0.60%). In the second sampling done to detect whether these 3 animals that were antigen-positive and antibody-negative were persistently infected or not, antigen presence couldn't be detected in white blood cell samples and these 3 animals were considered as acute-infected in terms of BVDV. Consequently, PI presence wasn't detected for cattle in the region and BVDV infection was at a similar rate when compared to the serological study done previously. Besides, the fact that close results were obtained as a result of ELISA applied to blood and milk serum shows that using milk serum in serological tests could be preferred as an alternative method to blood serum since sampling is easy and cheap for the researcher.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Commission of Selcuk UniversitySelcuk University [09101039]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Commission of Selcuk University (Project number: 09101039).en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1560en_US
dc.identifier.issn1680-5593en_US
dc.identifier.issn1993-601Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage1557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26850
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000298090300013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMEDWELL ONLINEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectBVDVen_US
dc.subjectantigenen_US
dc.subjectantibodyen_US
dc.subjectELISAen_US
dc.subjectdairy cattleen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleStudy of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) Infection in Dairy Cattleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar